Skip to content

Incosistency in toroidal flux calculated for diferent cocos/es

As reported by @malinak

loaded equilibrium with cocos = 3, 13 shows the different magnitude of flux function.

shot_no = 3694
time_step = 2.5 
eq = compass.cudb(shot_no, time_step)
eq.to_geqdsk(new_fname, 129, 257)
geqdsk = omfit_eqdsk.OMFITgeqdsk(new_fname)

Goal of this issues:

  • check the correctness of toroidal flux function calculation in plaque and during g-file export
  • improve documentation to clarify function calculation
  • add poloidal_flux function
To upload designs, you'll need to enable LFS and have an admin enable hashed storage. More information